Wonderful, just wonderful: now there's a "study" saying that Flanders scholars published in "predatory" journals X number of times, because Beall--that is, HIS UNSUPPORTED WORD is enough to form the basis of a study. (Edited: the study wasn't really scholarly, but the basis for it's pretty damn objectionable--oh, and they threw in a Hindawi appendix, because The Great Beall's still suspicious of them.) Arrgghh... http://eprints.rclis.org/...
